5.2Backup & disaster recovery plan
Backups protect data; a disaster recovery plan protects the business. When a serious incident hits — ransomware, hardware failure, fire — the question is not just « do we have backups? » but « how quickly can we get everything running again, and how much recent work will we lose? » Two metrics frame this. The RPO (Recovery Point Objective) is how much data you can afford to lose, measured in time — it drives how often you back up. The RTO (Recovery Time Objective) is how long you can afford to be down before restoring service — it drives the resources and procedures you prepare.
The key insight is that not everything needs the same target. A critical order-processing system might demand an RPO of minutes and an RTO of an hour; an archive might tolerate a day of loss and a week to restore. You set RPO/RTO per activity, by criticality, and size your backup frequency and recovery capability to match — there is no point paying for near-instant recovery of data nobody would miss for a week. Two related ideas: disaster recovery (DR) is about restarting IT after a disruption, while business continuity is about keeping essential activity going during it. A plan is only real if it is written, resourced and rehearsed: like backups, an untested recovery plan is a hope. Define your objectives, prepare the means, and practise the restore.
Section vocabulary
- Disaster recovery (DR)
- The plan and means to restart IT services after a serious disruption.
- RPO (Recovery Point Objective)
- How much data you can afford to lose, in time — it drives backup frequency.
- RTO (Recovery Time Objective)
- How long you can afford to be down before restoring service — it drives recovery resources.
- Business continuity
- Keeping essential activity running during an incident, not just recovering after it.
- Criticality
- How essential an activity is, used to set its RPO/RTO targets.
What distinguishes RPO from RTO in a recovery plan?
In practice — Set objectives by criticality
- List a few systems and rank them by how critical they are to the business.
- For each, set an RPO (tolerable data loss) and an RTO (tolerable downtime).
- Match backup frequency and recovery method to those targets — more critical, more frequent and faster.
- Describe one rehearsal you would run to prove the plan actually works.
Key takeaways
- A DR plan protects the business, not just the data.
- RPO = tolerable data loss (drives backup frequency); RTO = tolerable downtime (drives recovery resources).
- Set RPO/RTO per activity by criticality — not everything needs the same target.
- DR restarts IT; business continuity keeps essentials running — and an untested plan is only a hope.
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between RPO and RTO in plain terms?
They answer two different « how much » questions after a disaster. RPO — Recovery Point Objective — is about data loss: how far back are you willing to lose work? If your RPO is one hour, you must back up at least hourly, because you accept losing up to an hour's changes. RTO — Recovery Time Objective — is about downtime: how long can the service be unavailable before it seriously hurts? If your RTO is four hours, your recovery procedures and resources must be able to restore service within four hours. RPO shapes how often you protect data; RTO shapes how fast and how prepared your recovery must be. Setting both, honestly and per system, turns vague fear into a concrete, buildable plan.
Do small organizations really need a disaster recovery plan?
Yes, though it should be proportionate. A small organization is often more vulnerable, not less, because it lacks spare capacity to absorb a serious outage — a week without its core system can be existential. The plan does not need to be elaborate: identify the few systems the business truly cannot run without, set realistic RPO and RTO for them, ensure backups (with an offline copy) meet those targets, write down the recovery steps, and rehearse a restore at least occasionally. That modest effort is the difference between a bad incident being a costly inconvenience and being a company-ending event. The scale of the plan should match the stakes, but the discipline is essential at any size.